The 28th T
4 parade on Remembrance and Resistance Day,
May 2, was about the demand for non-violent psychiatry.
Away
with §§ 20, 21, 63, 64 StGB: Arbitrariness
in law: injustice!
The procession led to the Langenbeck-Virchow House
near the Charité. A conference of the defenders
of the forensic-psychiatric injustice regime was
to take place there on June 16, which we have already
made known with our banner, see demo report.
The weighty, retired BGH judge Thomas Fischer will
present his crude theories of an allegedly "medically"
ascertainable or negatable culpability in order
to conclude that persons who are allegedly dangerous
in themselves for medical reasons should be locked
up indefinitely and even arbitrarily subjected to
torture-like coercive treatment. In this way, the
dignity of the human being is absurdly preserved
instead of violated. The capacity for guilt is an
anthropologically established fact and not a medical
case, because a person can always become guilty
as an adult, even without biblical hereditary guilt
having to be postulated. As an adult, he/she should
have learned the rules of coexistence and is guilty
if he/she intentionally or unintentionally harms
other people or violates their rights. What characterizes
humans and distinguishes them from fauna is that
they are moral animals. On October 31, 2023, the
results of the essay competition will be pre-published
on whether the forensic-psychiatric injustice regime
is compatible with Article 1 of the Basic Law, i.e.
human rights and human dignity. See also Prof. Wolf-Dieter
Narr's response to Thomas Fischer here: http://www.zwangspsychiatrie.de/2013/09/willkuer-im-recht-unrecht
An
end to judges as beacons of doctors - arbitrariness
in law? Injustice!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
was the call demonstrate:
We have long criticized the fact that the law supposedly
allows incapacity to be established with psychiatric
expertise. The judge should be able to justify indefinite
and permanent confinement, even compulsory treatment
with highly potent drugs, with absurd terms such
as good facade or willful insinuations such as feigned
insight into illness. It is an attack on people
in their human existence. Because as an adult, he
can always become guilty, even without biblical
hereditary guilt having to be postulated. As adults
should have learned the rules of coexistence, they
are guilty if they intentionally or unintentionally
harm other people or violate their rights. It is
characteristic of humans that they are moral animals.
Being able to become guilty is therefore an anthropologically
established fact and not a medical case.
That
is why this legislation must finally be abolished,
as it essentially denies that we are human. It is
a species barrier that has been shifted into the
legal/symbolic realm, the simulation of law. It
was passed into law in Germany in 1933 and transported
the allegedly "mentally ill" to the gas
chambers in a systematic mass murder campaign from
1939 and murdered them from 1941 to 1949 by systematically
starving them to death.
The debate on the abolition of the penal system
has gained momentum since the German Society for
Social Psychiatry (DGSP) published its resolution
in March last year calling for the abolition of
Sections 20, 21, 63 and 64 of the German Criminal
Code. It makes completely new alliances possible.
This year we are moving to the Charité, in
front of the Langenbeck-Virchow-Haus, Luisenstr.
58/59, 10117 Berlin
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
